Legislature(1999 - 2000)
2000-03-21 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2000-03-21 Senate Journal Page 2670 SB 101 Message dated and received March 20 was read, stating: Dear President Pearce: Under the authority of art. II, sec. 17, of the Alaska Constitution, I am allowing the following bill to become law without my signature: CONFERENCE CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 101(3d CC) An Act relating to disasters and to the disaster relief fund. Chapter 4, SLA 2000 Effective Date: 06/16/00 Our current laws governing disaster response have worked well for many years, providing the authority to act quickly and to comprehensively meet the needs of Alaskans when disasters strike. They also provide the appropriate checks and balances in the expenditure of emergency monies. Senate Bill 101 was born as an attempt by some to deny state aid for western Alaskans following the 1998 fishery disaster, but was amended during the public process to make no substantive changes to the state's laws regarding response to disasters. The amended bill was overwhelmingly approved last year, including a unanimous vote in the House. 2000-03-21 Senate Journal Page 2671 SB 101 The power of the executive branch to declare and respond to disasters, including that which devastated Western Alaska, has not changed and I am prepared to respond similarly whenever Alaskans again are faced with the need for emergency assistance. Under this bill, the governor retains the authority to expend state funds for declared disasters with the concurrence of the Speaker of the House and Senate President. This is the same procedure I followed in 1998. In an unprecedented action, however, the passed bill was never transmitted to me for final action as required by the Constitution. An error was discovered that would have required lawmakers to meet in special session anytime a disaster was declared. Despite repeated requests for transmittal by my Administration, the flawed bill was held through the summer and fall. The duty to transmit a bill that has been passed by both houses is ministerial in nature and should not be allowed to become a convenient means to correct improvident or ill-conceived legislation. The danger of this precedent is obvious as it might permit presiding officers to thwart the will of the majority of the legislature or to impinge on the power of the executive or the courts. In an even more questionable procedure, lawmakers this session amended the bill to correct the error. A strong argument can be made that once passed, a bill is beyond the power of the legislature to amend it further. The process used for SB 101 is a violation of legislative rules and possibly a violation of constitutionally mandated enactment procedures. The chances of litigation challenging the validity of this bill may not be great due to the lack of substantial change in law created by the bill. However, I am allowing this bill to become law without my signature to express my serious concern over the enactment procedures used by the legislature. Sincerely, /s/ Tony Knowles Governor